New Development: Government Authority to Dismiss Qui Tam Actions

The False Claims Act grants the government the authority to dismiss qui tam actions over the objections of the relator if “the court has provided the person with an opportunity for a hearing on the motion.”  31 USCS § 3730. However, what constitutes a “hearing” under the Act and the extent of the government’s authority to unilaterally dismiss qui tam actions has been the subject of dispute amongst the Courts of Appeals. Read More ›

Developments in Michigan Controlled Substance Regulation: New MAPS Communication Capabilities

NEW MAPS Capabilities. The Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (“LARA”) announced the launch of two new communication capabilities in MAPS, available on July 18, 2019: Read More ›

Developments in Michigan Controlled Substance Regulation: New Exceptions for Hospice Patients

New Hospice Exceptions. Motivated by concerns that the requirements of Michigan controlled substance (“CS”) laws might result in hospice patients being denied timely access to necessary pain control drugs in their final days, the Michigan legislature amended the CS laws to benefit hospice patients, effective July 8, 2019. Two new exceptions give providers more flexibility under the bona fide prescriber-patient relationship requirement and the Michigan Automated Prescription System (“MAPS”) query requirement, both explained below, for meeting the pain control needs of hospice patients. Read More ›

Supreme Court Exposes FCA Defendants To Decade-Old Relator Suits

When the Supreme Court accepted the cert petition to resolve a Circuit split regarding the False Claims Act’s statute of limitations when the government does not intervene, it created the potential that the Court would extend the limitations period for private relators’ FCA actions. That is exactly what happened. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a relator can bring suit within three years after a government official knows, or should know, about a potential FCA violation—up to 10 years after the underlying event—and the relator does not count as a government official. Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Hunt, No. 18-315 (U.S. May 13, 2019). FCA defendants may, therefore, face more qui tam suits reaching further back into their memories and records. Read More ›

Michigan Medicaid Issues New Requirements for Nurse Practitioner and Clinical Nurse Specialist Collaboration Agreements

Medicaid Bulletin MSA 19-10

Enrollment and Reimbursement for Clinical Nurse Specialists

On May 1, 2019, the Medical Services Administration of the Michigan Department of Health & Human Services (“MDHHS”), which administers the Michigan Medicaid program, issued Bulletin MSA 19-10 (the “Bulletin”), setting out new general information regarding enrollment, billing and reimbursement for a Clinical Nurse Specialist (“CNS”). CNS is a relatively new category of specialty certification available to a registered nurse (“RN”) in Michigan (Click here to access Bulletin MSA 19-10). The CNS Medicaid enrollment and coverage provisions essentially mirror those that apply to a Nurse Practitioner (“NP”), a long-established specialty certification for RNs in Michigan. Both NPs and CNSs, along with specialty certified nurse midwives (“CNM”), fall within the category of Advanced Practice Registered Nurse or APRN, which have an expanded independent scope of practice under recent amendments to the Michigan Public Health Code (“Code”). Read More ›

CMS Administrator Announces Continuing Effort to Improve Quality and Combat Abuse/Neglect in Skilled Nursing Facilities

Authored by Joanne Lax (retired Member of Dykema)

In a blog post published on April 15, 2019, the Administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Seema Verma, reiterated CMS’ “sacred trust” to protect residents of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) from abuse and neglect and to ensure that they receive high quality care. Ms. Verma outlined five key initiatives that CMS has taken and is presently working on to fulfill this mission. While many sound familiar, the blog post evidences CMS’ renewed intent to impose stricter consequences for underperforming SNFs and to subject all SNFs to enhanced public scrutiny.  Read More ›

HIPAA Isn’t Only About Data Privacy and Security

Authored by Joanne Lax (retired Member of Dykema)

When we think about the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), many of us immediately think about protecting the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information. Justifiably so, since voluminous regulations mandate such protection, and because the federal government has stepped up its enforcement of those regulations and collected considerable sums in penalties for non-compliance. But a recent announcement by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Division of National Standards reminds us not to forget another important set of HIPAA Administrative Simplification regulations. Both HIPAA and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) require that certain electronic financial and administrative transactions be conducted using standard data content, code sets, and format (the Administrative Simplification Standards). On March 25, 2019, CMS announced that it will audit, via the Compliance Review Program, selected health plans and clearinghouses to determine compliance with these Administrative Simplification Standards. Read More ›

Auto-Deduction for Employee Meal Breaks Can Work for Hospitals, but be Careful!

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, all employees must be paid overtime for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek. The law also requires employers to keep accurate records of all time worked. Many employers, though—particularly hospitals—often automatically deduct 30 minutes from their employees’ 8.5 workdays assuming that all employees take their regular 30-minute meal breaks. But what happens when an employee is interrupted during the employee’s meal break to answer a call, attend to a code or other emergency, and the like? This scenario has been fodder for lawsuits against hospitals, most recently in an Ohio federal court–Myers v. Marietta Memorial Hospital, No. 2:15-CV-2956 (S.D. Ohio March 27, 2019). Read More ›

OIG Okays Complimentary Care to Patients in Recent Advisory Opinion

The OIG, in Advisory Opinion 19-03 issued on March 1, 2019, found it acceptable for a medical center to provide follow-up care in patients’ homes at no charge for individuals with congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are considered to be at high risk of readmission to the medical center (the “Program”). Specifically, the OIG determined it would not impose sanctions based on the Program under the civil monetary penalty provision prohibiting inducements to beneficiaries. Read More ›

Medicare’s “3-Day Rule” Continues to Challenge CMS and SNFs

Authored by Joanne Lax (retired Member of Dykema)

Federal Medicare law requires that a Medicare beneficiary be admitted as an in-patient in a hospital for at least three consecutive days, not counting the day of discharge, in order for Medicare Part A to pay for a subsequent skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay (called the “3-day rule”). On February 14, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) confirmed that compliance with the 3-day rule is still challenging for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the SNFs that bill Medicare for Part A stays. Based upon extrapolation from a sample, the OIG determined that CMS overpaid approximately $84 million for non-compliant SNF stays during 2013 through 2015. See OIG Audit A-05-16-00043.  Read More ›